No. 18-5486

Celestino Quintana v. Matthew Hansen, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: coleman-v-thompson due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel postconviction-counsel procedural-default state-created-right state-created-rights trevino-v-thaler
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether violation of Colorado's limited State-created right to postconviction counsel can constitute 'cause' excusing procedural default in a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED . ) . I. Whether violation of Colorado’s limited State-created.right to | postconviction counsel can constitute “cause” excusing procedural default in a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action, and under the Court’s holding in Trevino v. Thaler, 569 U.S. 413 (2013); II. | Whether a State-created right to postconviction counsel can constitute “cause” excusing procedural default for postconviction claims which are not based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel. . SEE ;

Docket Entries

2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2018)

Attorneys

Celestino Quintana
Celestino Quintana — Petitioner
Celestino Quintana — Petitioner