No. 18-549
Voter Verified, Inc. v. Election Systems & Software LLC
Tags: 35-usc-101 bilski-v-kappos collateral-estoppel declaratory-judgment federal-circuit issue-preclusion method-claims patent-infringement patent-validity res-judicata voting-method
Key Terms:
Patent Trademark
Patent Trademark
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Federal Circuit erred in deciding that patent claims for a method of voting are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 in a second action for patent infringement where that issue of validity was previously decided to the contrary on a counterclaim for declaratory judgment in a first action
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Federal Circuit erred in deciding that patent claims for a method of voting are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 in a second action for patent infringement where that issue of validity was previously decided to the contrary on a counterclaim for declaratory judgment in a first action.
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 26, 2018)
Attorneys
Voter Verified, Inc.
Anthony Italo Provitola — Anthony I. Provitola, P.A., Petitioner
Anthony Italo Provitola — Anthony I. Provitola, P.A., Petitioner