No. 18-5492

In Re David Louis Colson

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2018-08-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review article-3-section-2 civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction original-jurisdiction standing state-court state-party state-vs-federal subject-matter-jurisdiction supreme-court
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the superior court of Arizona had jurisdiction to render the judgments against the petitioner in a case where the state was a party

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . In this Case,in which the State was Party fo, there was lack of subjectmetir jurisdiction of the superior court of Arizona who usurped the power of the Supreme Courtof the United States in violation of the Constitution of the United States sAvticle 3, Section 2, that veads in pat In ail Cases ...in which the Stite shall be forty, the Supreme Couct shall have original Jurisdiction? Therefore, the Supreme Court of the United States may issue the writ of habeas. corpus in the exercise of original jurisdiction inthis Case where it has original jurisdiction 2 “the. convidtions and sextences of imprisoument of the Petitioner are unlawful and’ void. Whether the superior court of Arizona had NO jurisdiction te vender the Joes mevit which it gave in this Case in which the Sfate was a farty? . : ap 4 ey

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-01-25
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

David Colson
David Colson — Petitioner