No. 18-5494
Blaine Keith Milam v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
IFP
Tags: buck-v-davis certificate-of-appealability civil-rights death-penalty due-process fifth-circuit habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel intellectual-disability judicial-review mitigating-evidence procedural-default right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in not granting a certificate of appealability on the claims presented in violation of the holding in Buck v. Davis
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Did the Fifth Circuit err in not granting a certificate of appealability on the claims presented in violation of the holding of Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759 (2017). 2
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-06
Brief of respondent Davis, Dir., TX DCJ in opposition filed.
2018-08-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2018)
Attorneys
Blaine Milam
Donald Lee Bailey — Don Bailey, attorney at law, Petitioner
Donald Lee Bailey — Don Bailey, attorney at law, Petitioner
Davis, Dir., TX DCJ
Tomee Morgan Heining — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Tomee Morgan Heining — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent