Whether the Mississippi Supreme Court erred in dismissing the petitioner's application, when the U.S. Court of Appeals denied the petitioner's motion for authorization to file a successive petition under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b), despite new DNA evidence that exonerates the petitioner and establishes his innocence and false imprisonment claim

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : : Lrirodiiction OFA Missisticni CRIme Liab, EMS CS Bw Ro RSEC (OE iIRMed ~ | TACONGIRIVE RESIS Tn dre QueStionied CO BER oa Reha Up a eS Gal C5 iON Thal re Sled MeaAtine Osu oR ANe RESENIGE CF Semen GN Mhe RAT, VUINAR, Fintd Vaginia| Swabs Piosoluiely PRONG'S PEI FIONGR TLANOCENCe Find False Imprisonment Glaim. | ee ,