Whether the Wisconsin state court erred in denying petitioner's motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel

No question identified. : (D ¢ Punonip200 FRSEINAIM SEIS bMy posse c FREER NAIM vf ISOMIIOW IY YOY ‘wy Of pomuaad [7 Dyn | RAYA BEA patnVvire,, HOON PIENOSYRW IA of woud) , dl THAR Body ‘aenoawo yy? Mismoociy Jo QMS IVA PLO, Ww . ZL IPSUR U0 SO VA gem) PNP PNIWE VAD Y Of wba pinppyeaeR banen Povmnsay SERNAIM PPNVIMY QUA BUBY On "ip ary veo NOWESL CICS ~MM RAG Of zyban PIOUF NANG RAY pmom an? WA [] awncey PUY SIMLIM PItINN wy go KuexnwzeD WA IMiWoHID Of yn 24h Rove wa2d VMIpVaINd THIRVD MENDORIM 39 91AE 29h PIL, IL J WY NOHOW NoFINMODISOd SNOS)IM PMBD OA Sye7WNN gnoy dirt ¥0 SORRY CICEINEIM PTY HUEMYOD PPINOO Of mp 10 fptewaveon wy No Airiog rays cfrannotee {EM PmoMm +YA PIUPIOTS FoOtUDLICRAM! SL x8) 3o0W uy a rdowe pee 2rzadueINy meNoIRM Jo WER BYA PIO, “T | GaLNASaud (S)NOLLSANO