Whether the petitioner's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated by the court's errors, including failure to strike testimony, failure to subpoena witnesses, and making slanderous and prejudicial comments

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , o tly byeoti Y a oi] unlborm ese Ao 1226 Octendone ole ‘ne we ere 7 e/, Counselor for TAB, [IS 89h n§ was Very mach ey sorre fie ethes Mc lodbike , : © 0 ", fe bs fajler fo strike Mr Viasen pestimony of TPs he Se ft & eetpactarf (ounse [ Not peer Gor Sen PENOING Df pul Counsel net selypoening WTIBSSL ON Jofertatetlte Cewmsel mobkins slanctoreus ond eregit ory Comm Caf Counsel oddlye3sS anopher wt9® at gt” o/ ng 2 6 “cele! 100° removed fer Me pesonf Cae WEF" IM Oda he hed 8 pemooed! ot Phe shart Al 6 ®