No. 18-5535

Paul Lynn Schlieve v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-v-maryland case-dispositive-motion due-process evidence-suppression exculpatory-evidence fifth-amendment fourth-amendment materiality prosecutorial-duty suppression-motion suppression-of-evidence
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment FifthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the prosecutor's duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Fifth Amendment include evidence that is favorable and material to a Fourth Amendment suppression motion?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Does the Prosecutor’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence pursuant to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution include disclosure of evidence that is favorable and material in the context of a case-dispositive motion to suppress evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 12, 2018)

Attorneys

Paul Lynn Schleive
Paul Lynn Schlieve — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent