Whether the defendant-appellant was entitled to a new trial where the trial court failed to answer the defendant's request, Did the trial court err in convicting the defendant of first-degree home invasion where there was insufficient evidence to support this offense?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . TL. : . Ts )efendant ~Appeallant Corhed Fo A Nw Feral where The Trial (Court . Feral Coy Ned No+ Answer . eSenclant ~Appeallant Answere: YES Ts )etendont App eallont Kent led To Vismesal OF The -Conwitron And ceobence For Figst Jeyree Home Tnvasion where There was Lusuff iuint Evrdene To Find For This oFPense ? . Trial Court 9sd Not Answer Je Pendant ~Appealiont Answers: Yes