No. 18-5543

In Re Andre David Leffebre

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2018-08-10
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process entrapment government-misconduct habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should the government's use of a confidential informant to elicit incriminating statements from a defendant violate the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (') Should the. Fe. Roki, P. Rule € whet >) Shout&, “ Tuaislict iin lag proved Vo cama nhc nee OR *Gualty" ~ veahiet 2? >) ist hefectiues assistance” oF Coun te| , wher he tals, Te ask patves s/s) a a Weenin' 5 Thexsrey of quetdiaind about « Fabra ts Mh ghess con “eto 2 x) as theese , wot qa lace ob CGaw vt lvarmand® whed a BER ohicer® of lat (v0) lucats ak gave © The otictays 8) Sheaid The Cmeermen) atlognens the afl! ad 3 Conspire T3 dea a~ Pearson | aR place a ato A in a exvisemont (or) The ketewdontT / peritiivee (4 act of rand ¢) Cos The Gverenmont (°°) async els) . fu Ree a The pehs0d / Deterbadt/ petitivrze , into bei A in PoRurale | fe FHe4e| Tactics OR meth od , , dof 31 \ pe “dow Pe pguttns ob OT | a aa ae ee ge Seed cto ot ehved_ bg — eg — | ss eit (el tk ia) A eae tena ep _ {4 A-O-th. pV" , ter AL a reg en specie \ isi) lly en ike Urs REX Cp cabo | f 1 ave one , yw ss (hie Ficen ken. “Ty Queskied ef eee wins used oR mean s— oe | Dy eS iy Tae 08 lor ex ds BEAU “vistew) 3 4 BD pone Ea pie | aa Pe npnit —DiSTeF _pnga— 2 6 5 __(y Soba Adbaad Jowicdictiow) Troaddas 1 legal —pkoot 0h “anmershye of Terk tod toe shaven te 4 established, Wn all __fedleaan|cases (a)! “Shoulda + The pot itonee,be—alsoont hed “e_-Ravigw ale Aa — _ mitmess “Testud, eupbeacg 5 — OR — ee lexspcat —pstion dn fy 0k Teil NO _ 6-05 =04(S.D* x, Gal Divi) 2k —— ual us vescesss CEN Toe | Divi.) Adio 2k 0 4 eect huctac — isp ue, shased dn _aack_é Roun (lain, wo USH6 Eo, Sparogilel ee Laaprs. model XD = $0 1p tude he ao C estuesd naan, | ‘ Dveaeigny secusedl partys acich — “te legal —“Detonttey "ot IR An DRE — ie fio LEFEEBRE tt Salls_befoge— | Stes of — Ne AS tite, dated Sites of an temy to — pla rant Ro bs) Sas Ta Bpemenit, oF No G08 (see te _ Gal Di), adh _ ee. |-00 — sen (EDT Te Bin DD) was — Acscbakigg Via ATR AA a Meuse Adiat Kesaluctto) cartalales hed a3 To foe _execitedd 1A _aceord&= U fea shales, Cth s), DEF gaa pi As—CKe6eh rin — clas Ka At —— | nad _potilSaen, Ss laouk it Gp tee Tague 15 __ pai or .NaeeAs _ RyYQAS A&A — fag piftdan, Cae til vail ah paitiud’, ~wad cause Seaetidect nad hace at Ted cheat aa RAN Sb dy dal ag WAL ___[le The OR iWe ares = Tee eis. cured putt a\— mand ta ——Batnanitey geeks 9 RE + fey th bites gt Pog ta» supserrs Cret= TN Sat iscvels), ob Toes Hendles , . Ss 6S] mo | walls) Presale ® — Re re en eT es TL sal tien) ee | _ ahh —S ot the — Beattie Jd A pULA CLG) tevTion) ~ Fame paulo “ue y MATRA naa) — FRE tema Ros alse tied Tot bt tess | EY 2p pp 0 * K wats . es VB yee (dln lhe a ADORE. DAVID a (a 6 ot Sy 7 __ GA 30315 —

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-02
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Andre David Leffebre
Andre David Leffebre — Petitioner
Andre David Leffebre — Petitioner