No. 18-5555
William Womack v. Landan Adams, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-review district-court due-process jurisdiction legal-procedure ninth-circuit standing summary-judgment
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment DueProcess Punishment
FirstAmendment DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to review the district court's erroneous decision
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A. WHETHER THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS HAS JURISDICTION TO REVIEW THE DISTRICT COURT'S ERRONEOUS DECISION IN GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S. CONST. §12917 B. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRONEOUSLY GRANTED DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT? . C. WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS HAS JURISDICTION TO REVIEW THE OTHER SEVEN ISSUES RAISED IN APPELLANT'S NOTICE OF APPEAL LEADING TO THE ERRONEOUS GRANTING OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT?
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-27
Waiver of right of respondents Landan Adams, et al. to respond filed.
2018-07-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 12, 2018)