Whether the court abused its discretion in permitting a rebuttal witness who was not an expert in pediatric child abuse to testify outside his competence on biomechanical engineering issues

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I The Court abused 40 diserean When ft Permitecl A rebattal Witness Whe Wat 44 Cxpert VA pediatric Cchiiel abuse fo 4esni hy outside hes Competerack On bromechant cal Engineeng SSUES where +AL 4egrimeng D cbel not Satista the forndetioneel reguirementS of MEE 70d, 2) had « téncercy 40 Conf. SQ end misiead he QU, dared 3) was Court of cereals reyiesed Lar enrom area Claimed WO QhusSe of Mircretens The ral rg . by Vie Cour’ oF eppeatS CenfiictS wit Culing S be the. umled State Suerem&® Court,