No. 18-5567
Carline Curry v. City of Mansfield, Ohio, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-procedure court-discretion default-judgment due-process failure-to-answer fraud judicial-review jurisdiction perjury procedural-due-process standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should Plaintiff Curry been Awarded Default Judgement
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Ohio Supreme Court of Ohio declined to accept Jurisdiction of the appeal: the , Defendants failed to answer the Complaint. The Judge should have granted . Plaintiff Curry Default Judgement and combined the two cases as motioned. Instead the Judge closed plaintiffs Curry’s cases for not being 100% perfected. Should Plaintiff Curry been Awarded Default Judgement; the City failed to answer the complaint to avoid fraud, and perjury,
Docket Entries
2018-12-13
Case considered closed.
2018-12-03
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2018-11-13
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-08
Application (18A494) denied by Justice Sotomayor.
2018-10-30
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2018-10-30
Application (18A494) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of October 9, 2018, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
2018-10-09
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 30, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-07
Waiver of right of respondents Mansfield, OH, et al. to respond filed.
2018-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 12, 2018)
Attorneys
Mansfield, OH, et al.
Andrea K. Ziarko — Baker, Bublikar, Beck, Wiley & Mathews, Respondent
Andrea K. Ziarko — Baker, Bublikar, Beck, Wiley & Mathews, Respondent