No. 18-5568
Carline Curry v. City of Mansfield, Ohio, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: bad-faith civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions court-procedure due-process judicial-discretion jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge opinions-below patent procedural-defect standing summary-judgment takings
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. : 4 5 : . , » . . . . QUESTIONPRESENTED si . The Ohio Supreme Court declined to accept Jurisdiction of the Appeal: The Judge closed plaintiffs Curry’s cases for not being 100% perfected, and denied a motion to consolidate cases 2018 CV 2011 and 2018 CV 2012. The City answered the Complaint but answered under Perjury & Fraud because they answered in defenses (Bad Faith Affidavit). Should the Judge have reviewed plaintiff Curry’s Complaint and Ruled in her favor for Summary Judgement due to a Bad Faith Affidavit, and Preponderance of Evidence? o
Docket Entries
2018-12-13
Case considered closed.
2018-12-03
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2018-11-13
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-08
Application (18A495) denied by Justice Sotomayor.
2018-10-30
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2018-10-30
Application (18A495) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of October 9, 2018, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
2018-10-09
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 30, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-07
Waiver of right of respondents Mansfield, OH, et al. to respond filed.
2018-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 12, 2018)
Attorneys
Mansfield, OH, et al.
Andrea K. Ziarko — Baker, Bublikar, Beck, Wiley & Mathews, Respondent
Andrea K. Ziarko — Baker, Bublikar, Beck, Wiley & Mathews, Respondent