Christina Jay Acker v. United States, et al.
AdministrativeLaw
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated when the federal courts failed to properly consider the petitioner's claims for habeas corpus relief
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A/Srv Tite FSSISTAWT PEM ORWEYS BIER AL DE AG2p i 2 1B FEO Ce77RBUD Aad KELLY SIO RISSEY S8E BAAEEWEDB TO BSE CHHAMBE BF DP RMLLE Ftorn StAGE To FeagEnKAL. Cov IN CROCK ta Ge7 7A SHEAPIL, LITE SPRITES LUETAICT COW” TVOOE ... 8. AOSLV AIS SHIVER, So LISIWES THE CHEF — AI SDD FO FEDER AL Tiabe Bie ALLIED Fo WER BEFIWE LSTA IRISH ED LEUSTITRT ONAL. PHO LLDPES Si AE CRS Fa /PABEAS Cert des, VEE, LavtlT0, Attia LOAAL SOLE BF PE LS. BISTIIET abet F AS std PETITIOWER Hine Pile AWAT ye A UU TAAL TIER OF PRET 7 al FUDEKAL. AW StI CouRTS 7 F4-_SHovL The LMTED SHATES SUE DLL 1%, ~ FR OISE STIS SVL SOY KDI fig FOESER tbs THO IES PECT FOX FLL AYER I LAM LEVATS., Spada Pa) $Y ~ LRAL 4 Len 1S egw ALND LY TLAGLS SY2 U2 SIMO TéTI-A KS,