No. 18-5575

In Re Allah

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2018-08-13
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: case-dismissal civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights court-jurisdiction criminal-procedure due-process federal-rules judicial-misconduct judicial-procedure judicial-review malicious-prosecution mandamus standing
Key Terms:
Environmental Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated when the lower courts failed to properly dismiss the malicious prosecution against him, in violation of his rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : oe 3T, tf Loser te ses tage ts ae 2 a wa Tidings ve Page ef AZ. Petition for Ast Ot Mandamis ws. Page Sab Il gett Ee A Caocise. Stobementot the lose 1) 3 Papa Tonseig foe GselDn tee AbD Pash T 851095 It Rauje3, Patagagh (2) Transcrigh For Case Do CRIBIR-NN-L Poses 1D" 135 Bos 9B, lb Prop, sph (B) Costin IZ-O-OAGRAM-TID, Report, Rages Lined WSF. LD dd Page Patacinpin(S) Cases, (RISB AM, Toomcsiphel Sintering teasing. Voge dy Ay 18] Paget Pamgroph (0) Case a lRASIDA, Sadamment ln hGiuieal Ges 1 Pager, Parag tagh (2) belles dabea JO-I17 Froon KingtoaDlecK 5 hempl Notice And Dewonds MD, BaeieS Patatah (8) helbanduded i198, FomldetomplerRecors Annie Shocks eS BS a . po Sage tN tap Sve Mil, ee ae Be Qo. on Deyo) Deltlox ener a a 31(0) Fedeist Bulesok Criminal Procedure, Bubs 43, Dismissal. (6) By theCant, Thecoust may dismiss S| __D pressating ovchargete agnend uty, eo Eling andofoemtion against odefndedty or | GYbvingiay adefadedt total, 4 [lnhen the Recotd Chasep\in AS... Spek, CRS lia ~AMNL. logtk Ancerbs Nepathls duby _—_ fodiomiss the talideus Prosecution eS 0) 5 eee 10) Fedora) Bakencl: Ovi froediie Ble D(H) Oth Points Ts Gaunt Bolick, G) seaside ill ydqmeat for kod on the court, Dera this Rule apphy to Anam Hergerh’s Nudgee? HI) is, Canatin Akid TZ €1) Bul ith on edit shallhe gna each Shketathe publi ——__! Ads Records ond udidsl Pneedingzabony ctor Shen. Oors this Lino apelip ty AncenbaNasgey i et mst) nae; 1 (2) Wis. Condi febile TD clause! Ths ste Lindel Spleswhidhshel na ‘si tothe. Contibine oc bass 2E any Sinks to the Certoty ndahsanding. Does this opply to Aneerhe | Ba aagpity dado. US. Dal, Serior Sulge, Portland ER a sll. ccncin needed Theat pects nib poy hai, er psoas ost unteagonable seaes andsclautes, shallnct hewidatel, andnolvneds oe bitticAlibtonkune ——aatter _—en 7s een S79) a Ome 4 ball isout, bu wpon Probable, comet, Supported by Oath on affirmations... Does this buss aagph a Ale US. Cendfbndinn Amends SL 0 N peason shalllozheld tp answa bia copltel, of ethers info nons otine ta sone piesechnank obindisnerk of, Grand Taysss Mot be dept) of hie, Wbualy oppmperly thot is in araceis cE law When the econ Cheng) Mardn 35, adi in UndsDibSpgkane, Coben, Chi : pa sth nn Ee deans made bebe a.grand yun or cost, pursuantty 18 019.5 isn 2 _ 4 | DUS. Candtinn Anendment THT Exuagiv bilshilladbenalied ner tcesiv Finesimpssed, Al pot Ltuel and umsuel ouridament wficted.” Osea Ws mean tha vahen Ald? iss hel the SpeKane 4 escstne iMberce Yoe pasty chal) hove been duly comic ed, shall existuctthio the lUnites Sbhes, etamy | sl asic atheist.” Soca ADCs egal lin Diet Kindy b aunens Yae Ming Couitty Suretior Court Clerk, skeen in o bebar deed /O-Ri47 the (uses ate invalid | alent detodn a leer daded des 5, that thas na (Dansk Lomnibaen in inl Mb | salle io O2-1-D047-6 SEA. does this oman that Bncet bi Nagantty, dibosa Ug.sCa Sent On | | Sco Yoitland Conspited unter a issG SASSO. woth Kon dedke oP the bud Asis C8236 pois helng ‘ile eal Niro pt { soned 2 | al | eo Pee Ne rl Ssices | 110) a8 0.5.0, S188) iis, icin 4a compe on obit of the. Mastek hake te geofoan his duty, 3 | departed fromthe. accephed and winal coascoF iualciel praceeclings or sanctionedd suchacepathue bya HN lower coust-os to call foran-exetclae oF this Comte supeavisozy. power (UNS Const Bob $ 4. 1,0) isd. Const toneads WE” Que Proceso Lawes _. i (WNS.Consbs Morea ROL" Slovey oe) | ee GS) On Mosh 24,2014, CaseNo, CRIBB, Spokane ashiogo, SunyTeia <Day, VeovsighVolamedis, ——— Raops 110 ye eha Seaesc , EOWINRANDAL COSI, _Rasp.b ine 4 Yor, Yoo Spend 11 Manejo BJ My Gul dys Caso, paced NAME naneChnaye Todymtah a Gren chic —— eH jisrendicho the Reet oy He at Fede Deedes Malls A Campbell, on Tsitgh Bge 7, Jin 11 | head, ond ticided en Montiet Rage 9, bine 1 tonal, (LOvedion trent OEP Rulers) NY 2) Ontavn 38, 2014, Case. CR=IS-HA-ANAZT, Spolent, Washivelun Tay ltiel Oy, Tenens eR Pages 110-23. Page 110, Unite Shades of Armen Xs EDWENBANDAL COS

Docket Entries

2018-10-09
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
2018-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-11
Waiver of right of respondent UNITED STATES to respond filed.
2018-07-18
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 12, 2018)

Attorneys

Allah
Allah Allah — Petitioner
Allah Allah — Petitioner
UNITED STATES
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent