No. 18-5577

In Re Adam D. Boylen

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2018-08-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights clean-water-act commerce-clause criminal-law due-process environmental-law owner-or-operator person source standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Powhower, as a stock owner for an independent farming company, not being a facility on plant, is a 'person' Congress exclusively defined in the Clean Water Act to only mean any 'source' and a 'owner or operator' thereof - as defined in 33 USC § 1319(c) and (g) - and not to include 'every person'?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED t.) W he ther Pohhower, as A teock dewer for AW indeperctedt Fevekinga COmPADY , Not being W Frahty on plaot, 1S A “person” Congress exclusively defined 1 Phe Clean Water Act to only mean Axy “Source” Ana AN “DOWER OR pert” thereof ~ AS clefned in S3uscS 13io (3) and GY) ~ ANd wot to include “every perso” ? 2.) Whetrer the “one iwteepeetahoo Role mpphes to the Clenw Water Det when i+ has duel ceimuvnl and civil ApphcAhons, Qiving The Act a sinale MERDING 5 beuwg the crimivanl pppheahow Controls ~ with the Role of learty icloding AL\ Rbles ”ppheable to the interpretahon of cRimuvAl )AWs ¢ 3.) Whetter the Clean Water Act Exheament provisions of 33 vsc S$ ISN@ red 33 usc 1319 C)@DA) Require the spaschchonn| element of the “clene sintement rule from Congress Laith respect to the Commerce Clavse to hae Authorized crimwal proceed ings by the Lyrlea Sites wo ths case °

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-02-05
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Adam D. Boylen
Adam D. Boylen — Petitioner