No. 18-5581

George Jenewicz v. New Jersey

Lower Court: New Jersey
Docketed: 2018-08-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 6th-amendment civil-rights compulsory-process confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process hearsay
Latest Conference: 2018-10-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the petitioner denied the right of cross-examination and due process under the 6th and 14th amendments?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; IL Stocte west owt oF thele waywot to have thein primany weTvess Twa Tecentn, take the stawd ot two terials He cepested the Situation te police and hts vile testimony. tho the grad jury wet so Fac beyoud hearsay thet he had +o have cowuspt red_ wrth he prnecsten. C WAS Ae red the right oF eressExamiushion A$ +o a ibletey order the Cth, merdueat awd. due precess oF the 14 anend wewt A ppevdix G63-67-97 2, Was wot allowed +o demoustrate te jee “ny State © & mind dae ho Tartey tcation Ww Segara as) +he fo. Of bow “ Syvdeome. whew aa otlewed Hen tavtto my restlevce_ withowk vane Ewideuce shows Ow orden the ie Plaewece. oleh ofic, throng exam ples oF ee ~ This WAS OL violedion of due Plecess oF +he 6 and 14 amevdmewts — ,

Docket Entries

2018-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 13, 2018)

Attorneys

George Jenewicz
George Jenewicz — Petitioner
George Jenewicz — Petitioner