Whether trial court abused their authority by allowing the state attorney office to impose a sentence contrary to the requirements of the law on double jeopardy?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , WHETHER TRIAL COURT ABUSED THEIR AUTHORITY BY ALLOWING THE STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE TO IMPOSE A SENTENCE CONTRARY : TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW ON DOUBLE JEOPARDY? WHETHER TRIAL JUDGE ABUSED THEIR AUTHORITY BY IMPOSING A HABITUAL SENTENCE ON PETITIONER WITHOUT A LAWFUL CAUSETODOSO? WHETHER 3” D.C.A. JUDGES ABUSED THEIR AUTHORITY BY REFUSING TO COMPLY WITH THEIR OWN LAWS ON PETITIONER CLAIMS. WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT JUDGES ABUSED THEIR AUTHORITY BY REFUSING TO ADDRESS PETITIONER’S CLAIM ON THE PROPER JURISDICTION TO ADDRESS PETITIONER CLAIMS ON ONE SINGLE EPISODE? , WHY TRIAL JUDGE CONDONE ALL CLAIMS ON PETITIONER’S ILLEGAL SENTENCE? WHETHER ALL FLORIDA COURTS VIOLATED RULE 10 SEC (b)(c) BY REFUSING TO RESOLVE PETITIONER'S CONFLICT, ON ILLEGAL ; SENTENCE. ii rai ‘ a . ones