Valerie Mason v. Dan A. Polster, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, et al.
Whether a judge's refusal to recuse himself after being photographed in his chambers violates the petitioner's civil rights under 42 USC 1983
No question identified. : Questions Proseatep , } wher Whether HONldble: Judge. Nd & Polszen. by MoT Meuseng hmsl& Wheat pobhouen OQuneeTocl to RrTonnicy Rapp tatntotives ofl . DeRudslTS TAD DiinempCeuteeel) Qvodula FUE Ar) DucMOants Kassen Pun dato Meat. Plan utho employs A Physical Ww) Wh HAL ; Same Meme AS Judy. PolsTere AO weee VAC avi! MghTS ay USC “Se — \yolatcd when euler Aory phatogup h witha juotuctl 40 his Chambers w Most EAP han Hon spo pobrhenen (oust, OV DtAalpands: — | ALL Pantnes Do nov Appern i The Onprom OF TAS Once ON The Cover pnge Alist OF AU parr 1e The proccding In the Court whee pu dporin’ 1 VAL Subse OF This petra! iS AS A ows: Duclye Polster 2: GL. | Nouotabls Gadge Diab 4 Polste72 Cp L 13 SOLES UM Fe) HATES Court fuse 301 West Super un Avenue Courtneim 198 Cfevthork Ooo HIN: Offace o£ the hertore Couenet. Mower | kKloeL. Z. Apne. ate Loom SOl¥ wash hig Oe he? 30 000); Fo.ies ba %p 0 param poids ca) Produ’ EVE Go) Lines pe Avenue Monenor Nim Ob PUIKY4 ; Boe ee Sw iter Poh Bape Me Kaen “ ct onl peat Plas! 1300 sqbh Street due Ven thinw OMLOAHNY TABIE OF CoureNTS De OONIONS BEIOW. 0.00 we ee ee ee ee CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY ALOViSiONs involved: . --—-3 STATEMENT OF CASE. 0 208 ec ce ee ree B RENSON For GRANTING THE WRIT -7-7 7 Y COMCLUSION... 00 eee ee ES TINbDEX TO APPEND Ices ADDENDI¥ A UNITED SITES CourT OF ARPEHL SI ih . Cineuct LCUSiON 6/17/2018. wee ee —or9 Append BUdtired Stwres besbacr Course Northern Lisuct OF O10 Deciseov Waulz0r7,...-~~ -JOB TAbic OF Auwthoartes CineD , Discudlenacy Counsel v Payciten [ecren a8 Drsespl nity Onanuted vs Parken] 116 Olio finds 2007-040 SU3S.--1> ~ Diseefl wee ne YS sips _AN0 hules — Fepatil Fuapenrbanewwat 1S spot peRtett ROMER, OSE ConucT (PAIN BEXUB). as USE 4S -DisgualAcatod OF Dusiree Judye Mase sonar. ne 2 4g USC? 1983-Civil Ronan For. OgpiuvATrON 6 MiGhTS .-~ ~~~ 14 OTHE. _ 20 EVA brits 42 CORY OF LUNA ADMINISTRATION me Sheet wWNAuT mon-thertipy U2 Copy OF Cato hl renee OE Deonnrgecl ners Fallaprant tube Cetuye 5 fete”. Luoont in (Honig. =F : 1 ep abound Delvs efote Lupron npchionsl 197 2.8 | #4 Copy OF CharT Shouts wide Politehs Nolanes-.. hag 5 Copy of parte gecler Yoofs Prcrune tastucr 70 Chamberts. -Ale 5 Copy ap pen poet Vs Pe OO OES BT. py be FO namblee Wich ee ee te ee we RF : IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI . Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW A: For cases from federal courts: 7 The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at