No. 18-5592
Oscar Madrid v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights conflict-of-interest criminal-procedure due-process exhaustion exhaustion-of-remedies fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel motion-to-suppress state-court sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2018-10-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court erred in finding claims 1-3 were not exhausted to the state's highest court
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Question 1: Whether The Court Erred Finding Claim One — Three where not Exhausted To The State's Highest Court In Violation Of The Fourteenth Amendment... Question 2: Did The Court Abused Its Discretion To Consider And Recommend Denying The Claims Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2), Which Was Based On An Erroneous Presumption That The Three Claims Not Exhausted Had No Merit. 16 Question 3. Did The Lower Court Err Finding No Merit In The Denial Of The Motion To Suppress Statement In Violation Of The Fourteenth Amendment...
Docket Entries
2018-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 14, 2018)