No. 18-5595
Keith L. Williams v. Kul Sood, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process eighth-amendment in-forma-pauperis judicial-discretion prisoner-rights procedural-error standing summary-judgment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference:
2018-10-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether court of appeals or district court abused its discretion in (8th) amendment violation claim by failing to acknowledge evidence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether court of appeals or district court abused it's déscretion: ; : ry In (8)th amendment violation claim: by failing to-acKnowledge evidence. that district court erred in granting the defendants motion for summary judgment: Where statute excused payment of initial partial | filing fees: Since inmate lacked both assets and means by which to pay . { . & . . . . a. : .
Docket Entries
2018-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-09-18
Waiver of right of respondents Kul Sood, et al. to respond filed.
2018-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 14, 2018)
Attorneys
Kul Sood, et al.
Andrew M. Ramage — Brown, Hay & Stephens, LLP, Respondent
Andrew M. Ramage — Brown, Hay & Stephens, LLP, Respondent