No. 18-5604

Joe Fidel Flores v. W. L. Montgomery, Acting Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process evidence expert-testimony gang-expert-testimony jackson-standard jackson-v-virginia ninth-circuit ninth-circuit-review reasonable-doubt standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Under the standard clearly established by this Court in Jackson v. Virginia, can a rational juror find an essential fact beyond a reasonable doubt based on the mere say-so of a gang officer expert?"

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Under the standard clearly established by this Court in Jackson v. Virginia, ! can a rational juror find an essential fact beyond a reasonable doubt based on the mere say-so of a gang officer “expert”? 1443 U.S. 307, 318 (1979). ii CONTENTS PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARL 0... crete dL CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION INVOLVED . cece L REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT ou. errr A A. The Ninth Circuit’s decision sanctions the state court’s egregious reliance on conclusory opinion testimony and unjustly perpetuates Flores’s mandatory life sentence. . 4 1. The mere say-so of a “gang expert” is not entitled to any weight under Jackson. .iccecc

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-16
Waiver of right of respondent W.L. Montgomery to respond filed.
2018-07-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 14, 2018)

Attorneys

Joe Flores
Michael T. DrakeOffice of the Federal Public Defender for the Central District of California, Petitioner
W.L. Montgomery
Toni Raven Johns-EstavilleOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent