Whether the petitioner was denied due process and effective assistance of counsel when the state court refused to hold a competency hearing despite evidence of the petitioner's mental disability

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED and (rttadlaral Bor 1854 (Adem prFinew . hen Laponce Coun pk Bo arlek 0 rmettrigget fis wrenTaL yatoblem 5 OY Com poten eg wher Coungel C028 on Neh ee Lefere Aik at ohe petrhuers pete hes y Chal Yhe yeti heer Seypered froma Seuere Prd wus fe Beywed x fo [oy Brrmendarenl 12a tt pel fo ee ae Gra nce ¢ es WL He le. . ba fT. in Vise re Moe Cxe? lets of tn cmprelicecy rds C46 2 We the Debbi. Obrn-22D Ufeetue 4 EStSlae Ce Y Cra CnLb¢ Wen Counce [free & fle 4 meter to Suyyriess Corot ce ff Oo ben lau TRL Seaneh Ak tnlensIRk Artest based tr 4 wales parton teas Staats -¢ Serzecre 1p dhe Onwrarel Preccictengs | 0. Ue LOa2 Yhe Pebhurr Dens Ais [YO ane Roret rased foam BA V6lan lovey a (elles made plex whan fus. Cortn 5.4 Abbeved firr hk petted no tentésk Wilh &@ Seyere rental Mree Re gee Eine 1e Mela B. Wao tke lichens DireI hus hegjul po ffechus Brxrlance of Lenn sD ekrtea sete Ank /repert 4 ("San Ly A fen oe bereol en fhLE Cy lem co DP) Did the Sluts rut ¢ presecetin defense Attraty Deyptiie vke fleh hing of bus lef Qrnenchrent reat he chet pp-tceeers ’ when they fitet fe held @ fre ane farr Competency Aewasag Prinding $hat She edit ure Cesabilh, Bnd Miners « @ (Gi tw osteo lied Be ee ep ee 7] ,