No. 18-5618

Tae H. Chon v. Barack H. Obama, former President of the United States, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure fairness integrity judicial-proceedings plain-error preservation-of-error remand substantial-rights tenth-circuit
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a plain error affects the petitioner's substantial rights and implicates the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings, and whether remand is proper where the plain error was not preserved

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Where the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit leaves open the question of whether or not a plain error affects the petitioner's substantial rights and implicates the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings, is remand proper where the plain error was not preserved? i ‘ a PARTIES : As appeared in the Tenth Circuit Panel decision : (App. Al), the names of all parties to this proceeding are appeared in the caption of this Petition for Writ of Certiorari under Supreme Court Rule 14.1(b). it

Docket Entries

2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-09-17
Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, former President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
2018-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 17, 2018)

Attorneys

Barack H. Obama, former President of the United States, et al.
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Tae H. Chon
Tae H. Chon — Petitioner