No. 18-5620

Mario Zuniga v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2244(b) 28-usc-2255(h) attempted-murder criminal-law habeas-corpus mathis-standard mathis-v-united-states second-or-successive-2255-motion second-or-successive-motion section-2255 section-924e sentencing statutory-interpretation violent-crime
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in holding that attempted murder in Illinois is categorically a violent crime under 18 U.S.C. §924(e) without considering Mathis v. United States, 136 S.Ct. 2243 (2016)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Doe it. Did The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals error in holding . . . ‘that attempted murder in Illinois is catagordeally a violent i , crime under 18 U.S.C. §924(e), without considering Mathis v. United States, 136 S.ct. 2243 (2016)? So IL Did the Seventh Circuit error in granting MICHAEL HILL . oo authorization under 28 U.S.C. §§2244¢b), 2255(h) to file . , a second or successive 2255 motion inthe district court ? ; where HILL"S claim was based on a "statutory interpretation" . . a ‘that cannot be brought in a second or suécessive 2255 motion ? ; i | | | | , h : |

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 17, 2018)

Attorneys

Mario Zuniga
Mario Zuniga — Petitioner
Mario Zuniga — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent