Does fraud vitiate every judicial proceeding?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does fraud vitiates every judicial proceedings, if so, did the Fourth Circuit Court’s decision [at App. 1] affirming the district court’s reasons based on preclusion, deprives Petitioner of his due process and equal protection under the law—by sidelining his admissible evidence on file to invalidate his independent claim to render inadequate state court’s proceeding tainted with fraud which prevented the Petitioner from making his civil case in full, violates the Constitution? 2. Whether a litigant who had no benefit of a full and fair trial in the state courts, and his rights measured by laws made to affect him individually (to break his family and deprive him of his financial interests), not by general provisions of law applicable to all those in like condition, is deprived of his freedom, liberty, and property without due process of law. 3. Whether the Fourth Circuit Court’s affirming district court’s new reasons [App. 1] based on res judicata [App. 2] without relying on any documentary proof on file showing adequacy of state court’s proceedings prejudiced the petitioner in light of . admissible evidence on file in support of multiple independent claims against respondents’ fraud, collusion, and conflict of interests invalidating its previous Order at App. 3 Vacating the district court erroneous decision at App. 4, violate the Fourteenth Amendment. . 4. Whether a court can apply claim preclusion doctrine [res judicata] to undermine cases where proof of fraud is admissible to deprive a person of his freedom, liberty, or property without relying any documentary proof to show adequacy of prior state court’s proceedings, violates the Constitution. 2 of 41