No. 18-563
Darren Commander v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: 26-usc-6672 circuit-split civil-procedure negligence statutory-interpretation summary-judgment tax-law willfulness
Key Terms:
Environmental Securities
Environmental Securities
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Third Circuit's standard for willfulness under 26 U.S.C. § 6672(a) too lax for situations that at best are mere negligence in conflict with the standard articulated by the Second and Sixth Circuits?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Was the Third Circuit’s standard for willfulness : under 26 U.S.C. § 6672(a) too lax for situations that at best are mere negligence in conflict with the standard articulated by the Second and Sixth Circuits? 2. Was summary judgment inappropriate in: light of the record of evidence demonstrating a clear dis_ pute of facts as to the question of the willfulness of the Petitioner? :
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 30, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent