No. 18-5631
Steven M. Jacob v. Scott R. Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: aedpa certificate-of-appealability constitutional-review double-jeopardy due-process habeas habeas-corpus jury-selection prejudice presumption-of-impartiality standard-of-review supreme-court-precedent voir-dire
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FifthAmendment DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
AdministrativeLaw FifthAmendment DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-11-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Petitioner's demonstration sufficient to require de novo review under the Panetti v. Quarterman standard or the Johnson v. Williams standard, and was it sufficient to require a COA to issue?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : . The
Docket Entries
2018-11-19
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2018-10-31
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-19
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2018-10-01
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2018-09-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-30
Waiver of right of respondent Scott Frakes to respond filed.
2018-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 17, 2018)
Attorneys
Scott Frakes
James D. Smith — Nebraska Department of Justice, Respondent
James D. Smith — Nebraska Department of Justice, Respondent