Whether the district court sidestepped the COA determination under §2253(c) when it denied Jackson's appeal and his COA and justified its denial of his COA based on the adjudication of the actual merits

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Y ; {1] DID THE DISTRICT COURT SIDE STEP THE COA DETERMINATION UNDER ‘ §2253¢c) WHEN IT DENIED JACKSONS APPEAL AND HIS SOA AND JUSTIFIEDiT‘S IT'S DENTAL OF HIS con BASE GN. THE .AETUAESMERITS .? [2] WAS THE RESOLUTION OF JACKSON'S CLAIMS DEBATABLE AMONG JURIST QF REASON, OR WAS IT WRONG RESOLUTION.APPLIED BY THE DISTRICT COURT ? [3] WAS THE DISTRICT COURTS DENIAL OF JACKSON'S @254 WRIT AN UNREASONABLE AND INCORRECT APPLIACTION OF LAW AS DETERMINED aY THE SUPREME COURT,*WAEN TTSFAILEDS TO ADDRESS“ THE TWO PRONGS OF STRICKLAND 7 [4] DID THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ENTER A DECISION IN CONFLICT WITH THE ESTABLISHED LAW OF THE SUPREME COURT BY DENYING JACKSON'S COA REQUEST? {5] DID THE STATE COURT COMMITT FRAUD ON THE COURT WHEN IT ALTERED THE 2002PROCEEDINGS OF JACKSON Y. STATE BY ADDING A 3 TO 4& PAGE cRrossEXAMINATION OF THE STATES WITINESS APRIL WILLIAMS THAT NEVER HAPPENED ? [6] DID THEASTATE AND DISTRICT COURT COMMZITT FRAUD UPON THE S@URT BY PRESENTING FALSE STATEMENT OF FACTS ALLEDGING THAT THE PETITIONER _ HAD MOLESTED A.W GN NUMERQUS OCCASSIONS WHERE THE WHERE THE STATE COURTS EVIDENCE REBUTTS IT LELMING THAT IT ONLY HAPPENED ONCE. [7] Should the Fifth Circuit Court Appeals had granted Jacksan's Mation foe Judicial Notice and his Motion tohave Counsel Appointed?? {6] Did the Petitioner receive a full and fair hearing in State , Court and the District Court.? i