DID THE GOVERNMENT COMMIT PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT AND WAS COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO OBJECT OR MOVE TO EXCLUDE GX-DC-2, WHEN THE GOVERNMENT PRESENTED CRITICAL EVIDENCE, TO-WIT GOVERNMENT'S EXHIBIT GX-DC-2, AS BUSINESS RECORDS UNDER THE FED. R. EVID. 803(6) EXCEPTION, CERTIFIED UNDER FED. R. EVID. 902(11), WHEN THE CERTIFICATION CERTIFIED TWO PAGES AND THE EXHIBIT CONTAINED THREE PAGES, THUS MATERIALLY ALTERING THE NATURE OF THE EXHIBIT, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE GOVERNMENT WITHHELD TWO OF THE THREE PAGES FROM DISCOVERY AND SUBSTITUTING ONE NONMATERAIL PAGE THEREBY INTIMATING CONSISTENCY WITH 902(11) CERTIFICATION IN VIOLATION OF FED. R. EVID. 803(6)(e) AND 902(11) AND BRADY, AND THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE?

DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR IN DECIDING THAT TRIAL COUSNEL WAS NOT INEFFECTIVE FOR HIS FAILING TO OBJECT TO THE ADMISSION OF DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE WHICH HAD BEEN EDITED BY FBI PERSONNEL AND OTHERS VIOLATING CASTLEMAN'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS, RIGHT TO CONFRONTATION, FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 10029 1003, 1004 ("BEST EVIDENCE RULES"); AND DID THE APPELLATE COURT ERR IN FINDING IT WAS NOT DEBATABLE AMONGST REASONABLE JURISTS?

Did the government commit prosecutorial misconduct and was counsel ineffective for failing to object or move to exclude GX-DC-2