No. 18-5642
Miroslav Fejfar v. United States
Tags: animal-sci-prod-v-hebei-welcome-pharm asylum civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process extradition foreign-criminal-procedure foreign-law immigration statutory-interpretation withholding-of-removal
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether due process and the plain meaning of the statute on withholding of removal require that pending asylum issues be heard and resolved before extradition can be executed
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-07
Application (18A184) denied by The Chief Justice.
2018-09-06
Supplement to application filed.
2018-08-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 17, 2018)
2018-08-13
Application (18A184) for a stay pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Miroslav Fejfar
Stephen Reese Sady — Oregon Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent