No. 18-5649
Charles Richardson v. Jason Kent, Warden
IFP
Tags: criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-selection prosecutorial-misconduct recusal trial-counsel venue
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the prosecutor's improper arguments resulted in an unfair trial and a guilty verdict of murder instead of a lesser charge thereto?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether the prosecutor’s improper arguments resulted in an unfair trial and a guilty verdict of murder instead of a lesser charge thereto? 2. Did the Fifth Circuit err in deferring to the state court findings that Mr. Richardson was not prejudiced by his trial counsel’s errors when the Fifth Circuit’s : decision was based on a flagrant misreading of the trial record?
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 19, 2018)