No. 18-5663

Curtis Lee Dale v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: alleyne-precedent alleyne-v-united-states criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-sentencing,mandatory-minimum,ju drug-quantity due-process eighth-circuit-error fourth-amendment,search-and-seizure,drug-sniffing- fourth-amendment,search-and-seizure,reasonable-exp jury-findings jury-rejection mandatory-minimum sentencing sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the U.S. Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit err when it increased the Defendant's mandatory minimum sentence on the basis of a drug quantity that was rejected by the jury?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Question #1 (Page 10) ce ; Did the U.S. Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit err when it increased the Defendant's mandatory minimum sentence on the basis of a drug quantity that was rejected , by the jury? In light of Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013). Question #2 (Page 14) ; Did the sole-occupant of a storage unit have an expectation of privacy, despite his name not being listed on the rental agreement? In light of Byrd v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 54 (2018). ; Question #3 (Page 17) : Was Law Enforcement's use of trained drug-sniffing. Police Dog to sniff the door of a secured storage unit a : search under the Fourth Amendment requiring a search ; warrant? In light of Florida v. Jardines, 133 S. Ct. 1409 (2013). : .

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 19, 2018)

Attorneys

Curtis Lee Dale
Curtis Lee Dale — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent