No. 18-5665
Orestes Cabrera v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: all-writs-act anti-terrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-counsel effective-assistance-of-counsel immigration-consequences nolle-prosequi padilla-claim padilla-v-kentucky retroactivity
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Immigration
HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-11-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner's rights under the due process clause and the effective assistance of counsel were violated
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER PETITIONER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE AND THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF | COUNSEL WERE VIOLATED WHERE BOTH OF THE LOWER COURTS ERRED IN MISCONSTRUING, THEN DENYING PETITIONER’S PETITION PURSUANT TO THE ALL WRITS ACT?
Docket Entries
2018-11-19
Rehearing DENIED.
2018-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-16
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 19, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent