No. 18-5666
Arthur Dennison v. Mark Hooks, Warden
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2254 certificate-of-appealability due-process federal-habeas-corpus federal-jurisdiction federal-review habeas-corpus sixth-circuit sixth-circuit-court-of-appeals state-prisoner statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals err in denying a certificate of appealability to state prisoner Arthur Dennison to challenge the denial of his petition for federal habeas corpus review brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED DID THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR IN DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY TO STATE PRISONER ARTHUR ; DENNISON TO CHALLENGE THE DENIAL OF HIS PETITION FOR FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW BROUGHT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. , §2254? 2
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Rehearing DENIED.
2018-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-10-31
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-12
Waiver of right of respondent Mark Hooks, Warden to respond filed.
2018-01-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 19, 2018)
Attorneys
Mark Hooks, Warden
Eric E. Murphy — Ohio State Solicitor, Respondent
Eric E. Murphy — Ohio State Solicitor, Respondent