No. 18-5667
Matthew Desmond Browne v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: anonymous-tip civil-rights criminal-procedure fourth-amendment law-enforcement-procedure location-prediction probable-cause reasonable-suspicion vehicle-identification vehicle-search warrantless-seizure
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the Fourth Amendment violated when a warrantless seizure is carried out based on an anonymous tip that correctly identifies a vehicle and a driver's first name but incorrectly predicts the location of the vehicle by ninety miles and one to two days?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Is the Fourth Amendment violated when a warrantless seizure is carried out based on an anonymous tip that correctly identifies a vehicle and a driver’s first name but incorrectly predicts the location of the vehicle by ninety miles and one to two days? 11
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 19, 2018)
Attorneys
Matthew Desmond Browne
John Palmer Rhodes — Federal Defenders of Montana, Petitioner
John Palmer Rhodes — Federal Defenders of Montana, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent