No. 18-5671

In Re Kenneth Simpson

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2018-08-21
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights conditions-of-release due-process eighth-amendment habeas-corpus parole sentencing standing supervised-release
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a court can refuse to address a claim that an individual is being incarcerated under an unconstitutional statute, even when the individual has never received a ruling on the legality of their conviction

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : On eSthCreuthas reCusedtroddress challenges te beta supecused.celeos 2 and routinely addressed unoppealsoF revocation: This raises the concecn that repeat bot newondthefubure underlows ofqueshonable validity, — —The address chol\ ences te the under| wna conuichon, though these —challenags recewed ne ruliney npriexpracecdinas throug ne fault oF mourn —___ whichis uncansireronal Bron reson, cana Court reCuse to.oddcess that-claim wade Bondv US. 189 Léd ad | (8014) 7Ore release ority —candihens hearings under Jonge vS., 589 US (94 (AO00)? When a nelensee con shousthothehas nevecrecewed a his —annzenthe Legality clas undectuine Panels US, S3aUS B14 —(2001) allowstne releases ta raise heorings? Dees. vielode —Du2Process te.cllow the Government to relshaatethe ocaunal conurctionoroctol new pernkkes —vahule clenyinosthne releases orecipeecoleat? ——Mast Ceucts review claumsHactcond tions ofrelease mapede successful neinteqradiona—_ —ec1nerense maincorcecation cates,controrutothe stohed purpose cPrelease and Jolson UL S,,629 US. 53 (2800)? More Causctimpose conditions that secue novalid. societal —purposeesprobect against 2 ——Whereareleasee substantiates cecuse) ___ n.cther cases, marrthe Court sistomariydisnaiss thecla usa? a es $$ 3 a 7 ee alte ol Contents -Oprniens Below ee —ducisdretren _ Btoncdard Foo Mondemug —Constitutenal and StahwhorPreusis9$ _StotementCthe Case _ReasonsteGrantthe Wee EO Court nas no “chsecetorte cekuse taodelres6 0 __Ce_—__ to precedent: che release hes never tecemed.a colina nthe Leagreeg _ ___0f wis detention, thcoush no Gorsltol bus oun ATL The 8th Cceitis ceCusinate qive cgmune cemenwroPonnduions cf | celegse onclis ignoring SEX10US. 05 CUMAMS Aaa.Wask thes wnpossttom .———_ OO Tincheede appendices Append: Q__th Cueeusts Summoru Dismissals of Gees 16-1031 6 toute —_

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2018-09-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-31
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 20, 2018)

Attorneys

Kenneth Simpson
Kenneth Simpson — Petitioner
Kenneth Simpson — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent