No. 18-5672

Charles S. Renchenski v. Tom McGinley, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure circuit-split conflict-of-laws constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law due-process federal-courts federal-review habeas-corpus procedural-default state-courts
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Has the Third Circuit Court of Appeals entered a decision that is in conflict with the United States Supreme Court, all other Courts of Appeals, federal laws, decisions of the States' Court of Last Resort and the United States Constitution relating to the adequacy question of a given state rule/statute that could lawfully bar federal habeas corpus review?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ‘ I HAS THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ENTERED A DECISION . THAT IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, ALL OTHER COURTS OF APPEALS, FEDEERAL LAWS, DECISIONS OF . THE STATES’ COURT OF LAST RESORT AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION RELATING TO THE ADEQUACY QUESTION OF A GIVEN STATE RULE/STATUTE THAT COULD LAWFULLY BAR FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW? II. HAS THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ENTERED A DECISION THAT IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, ALL OTHER COURTS OF APPEALS, FEDERAL LAWS, DECISIONS OF THE STATES’ COURT OF LAST RESORT AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION RELATING TO AN ALLEGED PROCEDURAL DEFAULT THAT COULD LAWFULLY BAR FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW? ill. HAS THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ENTERED A DEISION THAT IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, ALL OTHER COURTS OF APPEALS AND FEDERAL LAWS RELATING TO THE APPLICABILITY OF A FED.R.CIV.P. 60(b)(6) MOTION IN THE CASE SUB JUDICE? . i

Docket Entries

2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 20, 2018)

Attorneys

Charles S. Renchenski
Charles S. Renchenski — Petitioner
Charles S. Renchenski — Petitioner