Charles S. Renchenski v. Tom McGinley, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Has the Third Circuit Court of Appeals entered a decision that is in conflict with the United States Supreme Court, all other Courts of Appeals, federal laws, decisions of the States' Court of Last Resort and the United States Constitution relating to the adequacy question of a given state rule/statute that could lawfully bar federal habeas corpus review?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ‘ I HAS THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ENTERED A DECISION . THAT IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, ALL OTHER COURTS OF APPEALS, FEDEERAL LAWS, DECISIONS OF . THE STATES’ COURT OF LAST RESORT AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION RELATING TO THE ADEQUACY QUESTION OF A GIVEN STATE RULE/STATUTE THAT COULD LAWFULLY BAR FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW? II. HAS THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ENTERED A DECISION THAT IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, ALL OTHER COURTS OF APPEALS, FEDERAL LAWS, DECISIONS OF THE STATES’ COURT OF LAST RESORT AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION RELATING TO AN ALLEGED PROCEDURAL DEFAULT THAT COULD LAWFULLY BAR FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW? ill. HAS THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ENTERED A DEISION THAT IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, ALL OTHER COURTS OF APPEALS AND FEDERAL LAWS RELATING TO THE APPLICABILITY OF A FED.R.CIV.P. 60(b)(6) MOTION IN THE CASE SUB JUDICE? . i