No. 18-5673
Eugene Smalls v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: career-offender civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-sentencing lochner sentencing sentencing-commission-guidelines sixth-amendment state-federal-relations statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the 'heightened' Lochner standards of W.G. Abel v. Estelle, AHR, override the state and federal sentencing guidelines of the motion of the judge, MONASHKUL's not statutes?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Vy Bes Tile 16 UW.9.0. 5G4 5 ARO VELLY Ad KE Instant cao BINER KE PEATELONNE 'o Stake ad Federal LOMickiond are based ON ONT BCRHK Bnd one Sek de Facis % 7) Does xhe *heierrank Londurk Ckanderds & WG. ABL > eatidie, AHR QuvKKONE XO hate hee Oake and Federal senloenels run LOARES OF Xhe MOTLON UE XhR SUAGe MOLONSKTULS vot SraAUrkes BEL BMULA v9 Aor ear?
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 20, 2018)
Attorneys
Eugene Smalls
Eugene Smalls — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent