No. 18-5676

Ernest Morris v. Pennsylvania

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: cell-phone-records cell-phone-tower-records constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy duress-defense fair-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel standing suppression trial-counsel unqualified-counsel
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment FourthAmendment Punishment HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did counsel provide ineffective assistance of counsel?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1, Did counsel provide ineffective assistance of counsel where : . a. Direct appeal counsel abandoned the suppression of cell phone tower records after the trial court found Morris lacked standing? . b. Trial counsel conceded Morris’s guilt instead of pursuing a duress defense? ; . I. Did the trial court violate Morris’s right to a fair trial by denying him constitutional safeguards by: a. Denying relief under the double jeopardy clause where the Commonwealth . intentionally caused a mistrial at Morris’s first trial? b. Forcing Morris to proceed with unqualified counsel during interlocutory appeal? ii a 1 . £ * :

Docket Entries

2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 24, 2018)

Attorneys

Ernest Morris
Ernest Morris — Petitioner
Ernest Morris — Petitioner