Whether the state court erred in denying petitioner's writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective-assistance-of-counsel where petitioner's attorney was negligent to such an extent that but for the negligence the outcome of the trial would have been different

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did the Virctnt _ hen: & ‘egies Sveteme Court error Lohen s+ ; enied Petitioners weit of Webeas Coreus alliging ee assiStance of Counsel where Petitioner's a or ney Was Wholly negligent to Soch an extent, : That hed; ne : , bok adit pot been for Such Negligence the _ 4. am of Ret iioner's trial would have been . TLerent. :