Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner's application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence (pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255) in light of the newly discovered evidence submitted by the Petitioner establishing that the loan application that was the basis for the Petitioner's conviction was forged

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner’s application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence (pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255) in light of the newly discovered evidence submitted by the Petitioner establishing that the loan application that was the basis for the Petitioner’s conviction was forged. il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The Petitioner is a criminal defendant currently serving the supervised release portion of his federal sentence. iii