Dwight Mundle v. United States
DueProcess
Was there enough or even any evidence to prove the conviction of transmitting a threatening communication, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875 (c)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Was their enough or even any evidence to prove the conviction of transmitting a threatening communication, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875 (c), was the testimony from Petitioner sister, Anika Mundle, sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a treat was actually made, and that Petitioner made the treat “intentionally” and intended a true threat in a phone communication made by her, and does the statue requires the Petitioner to be aware of the : threatening nature of the communication. II. Did the District Court erred in admitting at trial evidence of uncharged conduct concerning Petitioner’s prior conduct regarding his mother, Sonia Green, and does the testimony of Petitioner mother put him on trial for kidnapping, and not the crime charged in the indictment, and did is mother testimony regarding his prior conduct have a cumulative prejudicial effect on the jury, did his mother testimony overwhelmed and swayed the jury from the probative values regarding the threatening communication in Count One of the indictment. i