No. 18-5688

Joseph Emanuel v. Department of Justice

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2018-08-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-1915 access-to-courts civil-rights consent-to-collection-of-fee-form constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fee-collection in-forma-pauperis proceedings-in-forma-pauperis
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a 'consent to collection of fee form' that is not an inmate account form or an inmate trust-fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) considered a proceedings in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED: Is a “consent to collection of fee form" that is not an inmate account form or an inmate trustfund account statement (or institutional equivalent) considered a proceedings in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2)? T£ not, does this form violates constitutional: (1) due process; (2) access to the courts; and (3) equal protection clause under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4)? : ii INTERESTED PARTIES: There are no

Docket Entries

2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent Dept. of Justice to respond filed.
2018-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 21, 2018)
2018-06-26
Application (17A1394) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 13, 2018.
2018-06-14
Application (17A1394) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 14, 2018 to August 13, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Dept. of Justice
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Joseph Emanuel
Joseph Emanuel — Petitioner
Joseph Emanuel — Petitioner