Whether the government's failure to comply with its own guidelines for the provision of funds violates due process and equal protection under the law

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ect ket hen ofiere * eft Hower wWAs giver) At Ibe oreet ad yi Hee luo. Notice wis seat te py Addeess , oF fie eee OO foneeXs mar has pd dcess At The ow sef—~ af ow, epeyt . neues podedute, we ob lator IF his 17 Tr. pmertdues t= fe & fo Kqued poatecto> pod dee pacers: oF [res | L LE hose the pefitiere 1p Tuc ease The : : a) l mater A pepaes? For honetes yider Loa Pale [55.6 Aefe oda y TV Ade thea|d not A hehaies he fell 02 af wane sk The Mrryle F fee /4™ Ameodint-T-p , fhe pequrests be delversed A pel? f dae process dF (Aw, ) Ages? depavdtion of pespeety wi fhenT dae P ‘ 3. Ofd fhe sposderst3 have sfawdruis ts Ponectore.0™ A propeaty . bhoe e suppose awuereF She vole wire FANNIE Mge.oMewo 09 Siganfeneak Faure Moe's Popnd xf DinetTs types the. Coal Leconcls Cat Catvstees sach poser. Ax sabsttate tustee fe Me Pt spoudetS: 4. Loes frluve P Comply unth Bovernmes? Crarcde lise, 10) ? eouttenePanl AynecmeT Foe Fonds tmoviee 1 ssn y@ fren oF Jhase guidelwesy peach A height of violation wF Due foccess oF [avo Avd Kquad lrotector vurder. the hur viheo fhe gaveantmeate ifenest an [her process 4s wet met, hy not F(laws tig The. guide Anes.