No. 18-5717
Anousone Savanh v. United States
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defense-expert due-process expert-testimony federal-rules-of-evidence ninth-circuit-review right-to-present-defense
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May a court exclude a defense expert in a criminal case for failing to possess qualifications that Federal Rule of Evidence 702 does not require, the result of which strips the defendant from his constitutional right to present a viable defense?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented For Review May a court exclude a defense expert in a criminal case for failing to possess qualifications that Federal Rule of Evidence 702 does not require, the result of which strips the defendant from his constitutional right to present a viable defense? ii
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 24, 2018)
Attorneys
Anousone Savanh
Amy B. Cleary — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Amy B. Cleary — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent