Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should there be a two-part test for the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 instead of a Five-part test, and should the test be based on (1) illegal; unconstitutional confinement; and(2) a new change in statutory interpretation unavailable to petitioners
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Should there be a two-part test for the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 instead of a Five-part test, and should the test be based on (1) illegal ; unconstitutional confinement; and(2) a new change in statutory interpretation unavailable to petitioners. 2) Did WELCH v. UNITED STATES 136 S.ct 1265 (2016) clarify the standard of Retroactivity in ALL habeas corpus and create a test based’on (1) Due Process violation; and(2) a change during : collateral proceeding. ; iii
2018-12-07
Reply of petitioner Terrence Denmark filed. (Distributed)
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-20
Memorandum of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-10-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 23, 2018.
2018-10-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 24, 2018 to November 23, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-09-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 24, 2018.
2018-09-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 24, 2018 to October 24, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-05-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 24, 2018)