Is the APPELLATE COURT ORDER AFFIRMING THE LOWER COURTS DISMISSAL OF PETITIONERS COMPLAINT CONTRARY TO AND AN UNREASONABLE APPLICATION OF CLEARLY ESTABLISHED LAW, IN THAT THE LOWER COURT ORDERED PETITIONER TO SIGN A "PROPAGATED AUTHORIZATION FOR RELEASE OF ALL OF PETITIONERS MEDICAL RECORDS FOR FROM BIRTH TO DATE, PUT FORTH BY THE DEFENDANTS, WHICH WAS A WAIVER OF PROTECTION OF PETITIONERS PSYCHOTHERAPIST-PATIENT PRIVILEGED MEDICAL RECORDS AND INCLUDES A WAIVER TO RECORDS PROTECTION WHICH ARE NOT RELEVANT TO OR PERTINENT TO THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE LOWER COURT, A WAIVER OF NON-DISCOVERABLE MEDICAL RECORDS. THE APPELLATE COURT AND LOWER COURT DISMISSED AND AFFIRMED STATING THE REFUSAL TO SIGN DENIED THE DEFENDANTS DISCOVERY?

WHETHER THE "PROPAGATED AUTHORIZATION" FOR RELEASE OF MEDICAL RECORDS PUT FORTH BY THE DEFENDANTS IS IN FACT CONSTITUTIONAL?

Whether the 'propagated authorization' for release of medical records put forth by the defendants is in fact constitutional?