whether-the-three-collateral-order-doctrine-conditions-are-satisfied-and-the-u.s.-court-of-appeals-can-take-jurisdiction-on-my-pro-se-claims,-where-the-u.s.-district-court-had-taken-away-my-self-representation

No question identified. : —_O Whether the three collateral -order-doctrina conditions are sabisfiel and the U.S. Court ef Mopeals can Take the juris dichion_onino y-Prose—e \aims,.where the US. District Court hal taken away my self-cepcesenfation —__statel conclusive terms on my selfcepcasenbation —_-—Siriket my Prose Motion, and —tinestel the Capital ___Ga\Vstecal Regions) Counsel te Amen) my Prose Patifien Ca p ital Case a Table oF Comtants SF atement of the Essues ___Susistiction/ Statement of Facts Argument She ment of the Essues _The _theee combitions are —_setis fiat ant the U5 Couct of Appeals can take tre juris Ave Kian ow way Pro se claims, whe ce the U.$ District Couct Mal taken Away my Collateral Regional Counsel to Nment my Prose Patibion for MWeit of Wabeas Coreus Sn Eee —— Tistiction/ Statement of Facts Twas found guilby by jucy teial of double homicide im Sumber County, Flocide amt FE was sentenced to Death en _Febeusey 28,2012, Tha Flocide Supreme Court aC Finmed my —convielion anh Death Sentence. Marquarkt NV. Stabe 156 0 $0. 464 (Fla. 2018), On September 27,7016 ET filed in the US. Disteiet Couct a Prose Patition under 22.96.4225 . foe Misit of Mebeas Corpus(Docket 3# 1). On December 15,2016 thes Disteict Court let the Capital Collateral Resienal Counsel (CCRC) 50 onto the recocl(Dosket #242526), On ___Febeuacy 22,7017 the US. Disteieh Couct made Oeler that __sitriked my Prose Motions aml directed the CORE te Ament ___my_Prose Petition for Weit of Mabess Cocous (Docket £42), —E_sppoalet. On Decambar 28,2017 the U.S Couct of Appeals _—__foc_the Eleventh Cirewit stated tat since the US Disteiet __Gouct state conclusive terms om the denial of my sel€= representation that the us, Couch of Appeals can take the -—jetistichion onthe _U.s Disteich Courts denial of mg self representation, Than the U5. Couch of Mopaels af fiemeb the Us. District Coucts Fabenary 22,7017 Order onthe —__Aanial of my self copcesentation ant the US. Court ef —Apesals bismissal my Prose A). To Ait Petition for Reabeacing, Et was denied om March 242018, ——GAtrachel-Bxbibit Bh I I 5.0455 Fiat awd the i$, Couet of Mopeals can bake the 00 jurisdic hien_en_my Prose cleims,whece the U.S. Disfeiet Couch al taken away ony solfrepresentation, staked conclusive terms on myself cepee sentation, i —steiKed way _ Counse\ to hk meant my Peose Petition foc Weit of Wabess Cocpug The _U.S. Conrtof Appeals hal stated on pane of these December 23,2017 Ochec that the 3 collateral -oclee-Locteine —-tonbitions ace satisfiad on the IS District Coust taking away the _jusis.licbien om be Us District Court Taking away my selfrepresentation. the US. Couct of Apposls statebs there, the [us Disteiet Cometlorderis pheasel | in _conclusiv teems anh agrees with Toe. magistrebe that “allowing LMscguaclt} ba proceed prose will mot promote the inbegeit y—and sf ficiency of the fedacel proceedings. This conclusion i s_neither conditional nor limited, Rather, the octer —___———-te_chense, namely the complexity o £ the case and precertings bath in state ank foloral court 4 mo Tudge correctly found that (Marquardt) counsel there is nothing before the court toy ef \eet. i deficionci¢s in their repeesentation Counsel's 0 _-—_-£ffocts te pucsus, and or esecve EM Mecquacdt’s) De oon Glabmns, dleng with the compefentey issues that are Fo aing adbeesseal by tham in state. court, also unterscor@® po enh his requests For standby or different co wnsel mee doniels en We thare for a. Usage @@ with Flocida that Aho orlor does nol speak . sin teres sufficiently conclusive to meet the collateral-erler= __--_-peemission.to precaed prose. (Attached Exhibi +A). ce ee _ . These conclusive Terms on the deni alof.my that are on Pre U8. District Gouct's Febcuary 22,2017 Order are also conclusive terms on my Prose claims. The Fabrwacy 22,2017 | i. Oerear had strikel my Prose Motion ant directed the CCRC to Amend _uwmny Prose Pakition, FE can appeal my Prose claims on the Fobeusey 22. Order, be